Topic summary
ā 92%1 analyzed article/video404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Banks results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 422 hits. Analysis detected 1,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ā 85% (3,638 of 23,749 topics). This Jim Banks is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Jim Banks
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%4-H Schedule1%
ā 0%4 H Schedule1%
ā 0%Musician Biographies1%
ā 0%Class Analysis1%
ā 0%Cleveland Politics1%
ā 85%Jim Banks (selected)6%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 26.1%26.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos