Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Biden results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 307 hits . Analysis detected 1,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,417 of 15,325 topics). This Jill Biden is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Jill Biden
Topic details
Total words: 2,668
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst