Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jewish Targeted Attacks results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50.2% saturation with 1,515 hits . Analysis detected 9,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,018 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,097 of 16,562 topics). This Jewish Targeted Attacks is worse (more manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Jewish Targeted Attacks
Topic details
Total words: 3,018
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.4% percentile 10.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 40.2% 40.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 50.2% 50.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 34.8% 34.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 29.9% 29.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 16.8% 16.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 16.3% 16.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Topic 50.2%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 40.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 34.8%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst