Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jenna Elfman Dharma Greg Fox Upfronts results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 1,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,808 of 16,562 topics). This Jenna Elfman Dharma Greg Fox Upfronts is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Jenna Elfman Dharma Greg Fox Upfronts
Topic details
Total words: 1,600
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.9% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.8%19.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos