Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jemele Hill results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 954 hits. Analysis detected 5,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,326 topics). This Jemele Hill is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jemele Hill
Topic details
Total words: 3,424
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 27.9%27.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.4%27.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos