Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jared Kushner's Dealmaking results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 2,259 hits. Analysis detected 8,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,056 of 16,562 topics). This Jared Kushner's Dealmaking is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Jared Kushner's Dealmaking
Topic details
Total words: 4,084
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 55.3%55.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.5%28.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 55.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos