Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hussein Ibish results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 2,259 hits . Analysis detected 8,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,136 of 6,628 authors). This Hussein Ibish is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Hussein Ibish
Author details
Total words: 4,084
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.9% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 55.3% 55.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.5% 28.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.2% 8.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 55.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 28.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 14.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst