Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These January 6 Capitol Riot results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.1% saturation with 1,800 hits. Analysis detected 7,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,222 of 16,562 topics). This January 6 Capitol Riot is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
January 6 Capitol Riot
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠87%January 6 Capitol Riot (selected)8%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510086.6% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 58.1%58.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 19.8%19.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.4%19.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.4%29.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 58.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos