Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,353 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Talarico results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 2,338 hits. Analysis detected 18,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,052 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,697 of 16,562 topics). This James Talarico is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
James Talarico
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,052
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.8%25.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 17.3%17.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.3%16.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos