Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J D Vance results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 3,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,638 of 16,562 topics). This J D Vance is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
J D Vance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos