Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video922 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivy League Universities results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 2,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,766 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,541 of 16,562 topics). This Ivy League Universities is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Ivy League Universities
Topic details
Total words: 2,766
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos