Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos502 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivanka Trump results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 2,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,028 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,446 of 16,558 topics). This Ivanka Trump is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Ivanka Trump
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,028
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos