Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Itv results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.3% saturation with 985 hits . Analysis detected 3,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,689 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Itv is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Itv
Topic details
Total words: 1,689
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 58.3% 58.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 23.7% 23.7% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 17.6% 17.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 23.5% 23.5% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 58.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 23.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst