Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Italian Cuisine results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.8% saturation with 3,646 hits. Analysis detected 11,943 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,797 of 16,562 topics). This Italian Cuisine is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Italian Cuisine
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 45.8%45.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.5%18.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 45.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos