Topic summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos1,942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israeli Foreign Policy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 2,243 hits. Analysis detected 13,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,768 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,048 of 16,562 topics). This Israeli Foreign Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Israeli Foreign Policy
Topic details
Total words: 7,768
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.9%28.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.0%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos