Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Israel Aid results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 863 hits. Analysis detected 3,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,576 topics). This Israel Aid is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Israel Aid
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 30.2%30.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos