Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamophobia In Politics results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 1,654 hits. Analysis detected 8,234 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,278 of 16,562 topics). This Islamophobia In Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Islamophobia In Politics
Topic details
Total words: 5,152
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.1% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.1%32.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 19.8%19.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos