Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Daley results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,654 hits. Analysis detected 11,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,622 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,398 of 6,628 authors). This David Daley is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
David Daley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
49%David Daley (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,622
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.6%15.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos