Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isfahan results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 930 hits. Analysis detected 6,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,732 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,333 of 16,562 topics). This Isfahan is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Isfahan
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,732
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos