Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irs Audits results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 847 hits. Analysis detected 5,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,800 of 16,562 topics). This Irs Audits is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Irs Audits
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,140
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.0% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.0%20.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.1%11.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos