Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,353 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irregular Warfare results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 899 hits. Analysis detected 5,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,180 of 16,562 topics). This Irregular Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Irregular Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 5,412
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.6%16.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.0%12.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos