Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irradiation And Labeling results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 514 hits. Analysis detected 5,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,319 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,981 of 16,562 topics). This Irradiation And Labeling is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Irradiation And Labeling
Topic details
Total words: 5,319
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos