Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video2,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iranian Foreign Policy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 991 hits. Analysis detected 9,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,206 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,945 of 15,781 topics). This Iranian Foreign Policy is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Iranian Foreign Policy
Topic details
Total words: 7,206
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Special Pleading: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos