Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video5,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iranian Domestic Politics results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 4,505 hits. Analysis detected 17,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,975 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,641 of 16,562 topics). This Iranian Domestic Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Iranian Domestic Politics
Topic details
Total words: 14,975
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.3%13.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos