Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran US Israel War Oil Hormuz May 14 results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 2,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,357 of 16,562 topics). This Iran US Israel War Oil Hormuz May 14 is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Iran US Israel War Oil Hormuz May 14
Topic details
Total words: 3,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos