Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Negotiations results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 824 hits. Analysis detected 8,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,940 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,088 of 16,559 topics). This Iran Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Iran Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 8,940
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos