Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran National Football Team results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 1,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,081 of 16,562 topics). This Iran National Football Team is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Iran National Football Team
Topic details
Total words: 1,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos