Topic summary
â 68% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran-Israel Relations results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,354 hits . Analysis detected 12,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,803 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of â 54% (7,618 of 16,562 topics). This Iran-Israel Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group. Iran-Israel Relations
Topic details
Total words: 8,803
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst