Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Government results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,799 hits. Analysis detected 15,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,634 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,831 of 15,515 topics). This Iran Government is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Iran Government

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos