Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Diplomacy results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 611 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,479 of 16,562 topics). This Iran Diplomacy is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Iran Diplomacy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos