Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Cease Fire results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 330 hits . Analysis detected 2,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,824 of 16,562 topics). This Iran Cease Fire is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. Iran Cease Fire
Topic details
Total words: 3,972
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst