Topic summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iphone Updates results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 283 hits. Analysis detected 1,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,079 of 16,562 topics). This Iphone Updates is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Iphone Updates
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.3% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos