Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ipad Buying Guide results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 681 hits. Analysis detected 3,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,359 of 16,562 topics). This Ipad Buying Guide is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Ipad Buying Guide
Topic details
Total words: 4,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos