Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ipad Air results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 1,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Ipad Air is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ipad Air
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,764
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 16.6%16.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos