Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,005 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investment Risk results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 876 hits. Analysis detected 7,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,387 of 16,562 topics). This Investment Risk is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Investment Risk
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,020
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos