Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Investment Bubbles results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 2,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,353 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Investment Bubbles is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Investment Bubbles
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Investment Bubbles (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,353
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 22.8%22.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.8%13.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 7.7%7.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos