Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Invertebrates results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 5,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,775 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,841 of 16,562 topics). This Invertebrates is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
Invertebrates
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

10% percentile
025507510010.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos