Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,019 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guardian community team results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 846 hits . Analysis detected 5,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,076 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,036 of 6,628 authors). This Guardian community team is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Guardian community team
Author details
Total words: 4,076
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.8% 20.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.5% 15.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst