Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,335 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intimate Partner Violence results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 534 hits. Analysis detected 3,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,005 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,339 of 16,562 topics). This Intimate Partner Violence is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Intimate Partner Violence
Topic details
Total words: 4,005
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos