Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interventionism results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 1,319 hits. Analysis detected 8,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,465 of 15,535 topics). This Interventionism is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Interventionism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,204
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.4%31.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos