Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interstate Aid results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Pessimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 2,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,657 of 16,562 topics). This Interstate Aid is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Interstate Aid
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠54%Interstate Aid (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,676
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos