Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interstate 5 results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 365 hits . Analysis detected 3,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,006 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,745 of 16,562 topics). This Interstate 5 is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. Interstate 5
Topic details
Total words: 2,006
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.4% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 18.2% 18.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.6% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst