Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Internet Of Things results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 3,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,291 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Internet Of Things is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Internet Of Things
Topic details
Total words: 3,291
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos