Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Internet Censorship results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Slippery Slope, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48.1% saturation with 956 hits. Analysis detected 4,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,989 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,909 of 16,562 topics). This Internet Censorship is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Internet Censorship
Topic details
Total words: 1,989
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.5% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 23.6%23.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 48.1%48.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 25.5%25.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.4%11.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 48.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos