Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Troops results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.6% saturation with 2,205 hits. Analysis detected 6,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,388 of 16,562 topics). This International Troops is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
International Troops
Topic details
Total words: 4,111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 53.6%53.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 53.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos