Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 949 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Olympic Committee results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.7% saturation with 1,487 hits . Analysis detected 6,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,821 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,965 of 16,562 topics). This International Olympic Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. International Olympic Committee
Topic details
Total words: 2,821
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.1% percentile 7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 52.7% 52.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 22.2% 22.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 33.2% 33.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 33.3% 33.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 52.7%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst