Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Hockey results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 454 hits. Analysis detected 2,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,148 of 16,562 topics). This International Hockey is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
International Hockey
Topic details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos