Topic summary
⁠87%5 analyzed articles/videos1,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Finance results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 1,440 hits. Analysis detected 8,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,088 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,330 of 16,562 topics). This International Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
International Finance
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 23.6%23.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos