Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,049 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Comparison results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 2,072 hits. Analysis detected 9,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,147 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,926 of 16,562 topics). This International Comparison is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
International Comparison
Topic details
Total words: 6,147
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
5.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 33.7%33.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 33.7%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos