Topic summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Child Abduction results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 329 hits . Analysis detected 2,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,157 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,876 of 16,486 topics). This International Child Abduction is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. International Child Abduction
Topic details
Total words: 2,157
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.4% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst